Jump to content

User talk:Gregdavis1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2013[edit]

you have made brilliant contributions to the wikipedia pages

November 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Hakimullah Mehsud has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Giorgi Margvelashvili with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —MelbourneStartalk 11:36, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Owen, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Michael Owen was changed by Gregdavis1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.979151 on 2013-11-04T11:42:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taxal Lodge.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Taxal Lodge.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Whaley Bridge. —MelbourneStartalk 12:17, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Taxal Lodge.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Taxal Lodge.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:20, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Chapel-en-le-Frith High School has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stockport Grammar School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stockport Grammar School was changed by Gregdavis1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.944715 on 2013-11-12T14:44:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:44, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Parliament of the United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Parliament of the United Kingdom was changed by Gregdavis1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962199 on 2013-11-12T14:49:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Parliament of the United Kingdom. Marek.69 talk 14:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Mark Arsten (talk) 15:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]